Legal Opinion

Rush v. Cornett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 27, 1916PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Perry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Reversing in part and affirming in part.

This suit was brought in tbe Perry circuit court by Arcb Cornett against the appellant, C. C. Rush, as defendant, to recover from him damages for trespassing upon a tract of land consisting of 400 acres lying in Perry county, which tract was patented to one Sampson Brashears by the Commonwealth of Kentucky on August 27, 1846, the plaintiff claiming that he purchased the land from the heirs of the patentee by deed which was executed to him on the 17th day of February, 1883. He also claimed title by adverse possession.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Winchester v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Gilbert v. ParrottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Johnson v. MyerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Dupoyster v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. May v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Wilcox v. SamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Mason v. FusonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Bailey's Widow & Heirs v. SeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Crawford v. WiedemannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API