Legal Opinion

People v. Espinoza

California Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2016No. S224929PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

The unusual circumstances of this case present a cautionary tale for defendants who choose to represent themselves, for in the end, this defendant has no one but himself to blame for any failure to present a defense.

Defendant here waged a long campaign of manipulation and delay of his trial proceedings after being held to answer on a number of felony and misdemeanor charges. He was represented by seven different appointed counsel over the course of more than two years, largely due to how difficult a client he was. Over the same period, five different deputy…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  2. People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. Antuna CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. BradenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2023
  5. People v. CraineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API