People v. Espinoza
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.
The unusual circumstances of this case present a cautionary tale for defendants who choose to represent themselves, for in the end, this defendant has no one but himself to blame for any failure to present a defense.
Defendant here waged a long campaign of manipulation and delay of his trial proceedings after being held to answer on a number of felony and misdemeanor charges. He was represented by seven different appointed counsel over the course of more than two years, largely due to how difficult a client he was. Over the same period, five different deputy…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Antuna CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. BradenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2023
- People v. CraineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.