Legal Opinion

People v. Ramos

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 2016No. B248512PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZELON, Acting P. J.

Rafael Ramos was charged with making criminal threats against Nancy Garcia, and elected to represent himself at trial. Prior to opening statements, the trial court removed Ramos from the courtroom for disruptive conduct. No standby counsel was appointed to represent him in his absence. During Ramos’s period of exclusion, the prosecution presented its opening statement and conducted a direct examination of Garcia. Ramos was then permitted to return to the courtroom and participate in the remainder of trial. The jury found him guilty.

On appeal, Ramos argues that (1)…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. TejadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API