Legal Opinion

People v. Ramirez

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2022No. S262010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARCOS ANTONIO RAMIREZ, Defendant and Appellant. S262010 Fifth Appellate District F076126 Tuolumne County Superior Court CRF50964 December 5, 2022 Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Corrigan, Groban, Jenkins, and Guerrero concurred. Justices Liu filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Kruger filed a dissenting opinion. PEOPLE v. RAMIREZ S262010 Opinion of the Court by Cantil-Sakauye, C. J. A criminal defendant has a constitutional right to be present at trial. Yet, once trial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HersomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  2. People v. StubblefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. Quach v. Cal. Commerce Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API