Legal Opinion

State v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 25, 1997No. 79348PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIMBAUGH, Judge.

Defendant Naomi Ruth Barnes appeals her convictions under § 287.128, RSMo 1994, for workers’ compensation fraud. She initially appealed to the Court of Appeals, Eastern District, challenging, among other things, the constitutionality of § 287.128 on due process grounds. We have exclusive appellate juris diction of appeals challenging the validity of statutes. Mo. Const, art. V, § 3. Therefore, the court of appeals properly transferred the case to this Court. We affirm Barnes’ convictions.

I. FACTS

The State charged Barnes with five counts of committing workers’ compensation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. DulanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. State v. KnappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BradshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Hyde v. Department of Mental HealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State v. CarlockMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. EiseleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. GriffinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API