Legal Opinion
Jorgen v. Kierulff v. Metropolitan Stevedore Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 14, 1962No. 17638PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
The appellee has moved the court for an order striking points 2 to 8, inclusive, and point 10, from appellant’s statement of points on appeal. The motion recites that it is based on Rule 75(e) and (h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Examination of the memorandum filed in support of the motion indicates that the motion is based upon the appellee’s contention that this court is not in a position to consider or pass upon any of the matters referred to in the points mentioned.
The pretrial order in this case discloses that this was an action for damages and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Muncie Gear Works, Inc. v. Outboard, Marine & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Harries v. Air King Products Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Patent Scaffolding Co., Inc. v. Upright, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Helbush v. FinkleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- M. O. S. Corporation v. John I. Haas Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Templeton Patents, Ltd. v. J. R. Simplot Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1963