Legal Opinion
Ex parte Crandall
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided May 4, 1931No. 9125PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
The questions presented by respondent’s motion to quash the writ of habeas corpus are both interesting and novel. They grow out of the following state of facts:
The Vanderburgh county probate court of Indiana appointed Inez B. Crandall administratrix of the estate of her husband, who met his death while operating a locomotive engine for the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, which was a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Kentucky and engaged in interstate and intrastate commerce in the states of Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, Missouri, and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Ableman v. BoothSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ex Parte CrandallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Bankers Life Co. v. LoringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933