Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Crandall

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 23, 1931No. 4593PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.

The appeal is from an order discharging a writ of habeas corpus and remanding, appellant to the custody of the sheriff of Vanderburgh county, Ind.

The controversy arose out of litigation respecting a suit brought by appellant, a resident of Vanderburgh county, against the Louisville & Nashville Railway Company for alleged wrongful causing of the death of appellant’s husband, an emplojme of the railroad, while he was engaged in interstate commerce.

Appellant was appointed, April 10, 1930, by .the Vanderburgh county probate court, administratrix of her husband’s estate.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Sandage v. Studabaker Bros. Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Reed's Administratrix v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. McGinleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. James v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. PainterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  4. Baltimore & OR Co. v. ClemDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1941
  5. Consumers' Co. v. Goodrich Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API