Liebnow ex rel. Liebnow v. Boston Enterprises Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bender
T1 We granted this petition for original jurisdiction under C.A.R. 21 to review the trial court's order denying a law firm's motion for pro hac vice admission to represent the plaintiff where an attorney at that same law firm had previously consulted with defense counsel about the case.
1 2 This is a personal injury case against a restaurant resulting from an alleged food-borne illness. The plaintiff sought to have a small out-of-state law firm that specializes in food-borne illness claims admitted pro hac vice to aid in the preparation and presentation of the case. The defendant objected on…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Freedom Colorado Information, Inc. v. El Paso County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- In Re Appeal of Infotechnology, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Fognani v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- United States v. MilnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Murray v. Just in Case Business Lighthouse, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Just in Case Business Lighthouse, LLC v. MurrayColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Anzora v. LezamaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- In re People v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- In re People v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.