Legal Opinion

Liebnow ex rel. Liebnow v. Boston Enterprises Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 4, 2013No. Supreme Court Case No. 12SA83PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bender

T1 We granted this petition for original jurisdiction under C.A.R. 21 to review the trial court's order denying a law firm's motion for pro hac vice admission to represent the plaintiff where an attorney at that same law firm had previously consulted with defense counsel about the case.

1 2 This is a personal injury case against a restaurant resulting from an alleged food-borne illness. The plaintiff sought to have a small out-of-state law firm that specializes in food-borne illness claims admitted pro hac vice to aid in the preparation and presentation of the case. The defendant objected on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Freedom Colorado Information, Inc. v. El Paso County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. In Re Appeal of Infotechnology, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. Fognani v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. United States v. MilnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Murray v. Just in Case Business Lighthouse, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  2. Just in Case Business Lighthouse, LLC v. MurrayColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Anzora v. LezamaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
  4. In re People v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  5. In re People v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API