Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re People v. Hoskins

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 8, 2014No. Supreme Court Case 13SA245Published

1DissentChief Justice Rice

£40 In July 2012, Peters Mair Wilcox ("PMW"), a Colorado-based law firm, represented several parties in connection with a criminal investigation conducted by the Colorado Department of Revenue ("DOR"). PMW represented Conley Hoskins individually; additionally, it represented two medical marijuana dispensaries in which Hoskins had an ownership stake, All Care Wellness, LLC ("All Care"), and Jane Medicals, LLC ("Jane Medicals"), in their organizational capacities. PMW communicated extensively with the Senior Assistant Attorney General on behalf of these three clients during the course of its…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Carrillo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. Dunlap v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  5. People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API