Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Cissell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1912No. 1816PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; Roy Hoffman, Judge. ‘ Action by Abiel J. Perkins against W. E. Cissell and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This is a suit to quiet title. Abiel J. Perkins, plaintiff in error, was plaintiff, and Cissell, Riggs, and Clqpp, defendants in error, were defendants in the trial court. They will be referred to here as they were called there.

On February 6, 1892, Ca-so-wath-ca-ca, an Indian of the •absentee Shawnee Tribe or Band, whose English name was Billy Panther, had issued to him a trust patent to lots 4, 5, and •6 south of north fork of the Canadian river, in section 28, township 10 N., range 4 E., in Pottawatomie county, Okla., under act of Congress approved February 8, 1887, c.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Trustees of Union College v. WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Miller v. LarnedIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Blakemore v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Lewis v. ClementsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Howard v. FarrarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. Anthis v. SandlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Carter v. PickettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Amarex, Inc. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Tenneco Oil Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API