Legal Opinion

Arthur Land Co., LLC v. Otsego County

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 2002No. Docket 225459PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBandstra, C.J.

Plaintiff Arthur Land Company, L.L.C., appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting defendant Otsego County summary disposition of plaintiff’s complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief. We reverse and remand.

I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In November 1997, plaintiff petitioned to rezone property located in Livingston Township from its current designation of R-l (residential district), to a zone that would ultimately permit construction of a convenience store and gas station. Livingston Township, which is located in Otsego County, does not have its own zoning ordinance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Paragon Properties Co. v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Electri-Tech, Inc. v. H F Campbell Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Holland v. LiedelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Natural Resources Defense Council v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Susan R Bruley Trust v. City of BirminghamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Church & Church, Inc. v. A-1 CarpentryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Church & Church, Inc. v. A-1 CARPENTRYMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. In Re FGMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API