Batchelor v. Batchelor
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Before plaintiff was entitled to a judgment of separation upon the ground that defendant had failed to support her while they were living separate and apart by mutual consent, it was necessary for her to establish that she offered in good faith to return to her husband and resume the marital status. Lack óf that proof required a dismissal of her second cause of action. (Solomon v. Solomon, 290 N. Y. 337. 340-341; cf. Mirizio v. Mirizio, 242 N. Y. 74, 82.) Accordingly it was error to direct judgment of separation in favor of plaintiff and against the- defendant. Insofar as the judgment directs…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Solomon v. SolomonNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
3Cited by13 opinions
- Steinberg v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Dominick v. DominickNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Eylman v. EylmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Cannon v. CannonNew York Family Court · 1947
- Filicaza v. FilicazaNew York Family Court · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.