Legal Opinion
Cannon v. Cannon
New York Family Court
Decided July 9, 1947PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSicher, J.
These are companion proceedings, by consent tried simultaneously.
The first is based on a petition filed by a mother in behalf of twin children, pursuant to section 111, subdivision 2 of section 29, subdivision (1) of section 91, subdivisions (1), (2), (3) and (4) of section 92, subdivision 1 of section 101 and subdivision 1 of section 103 of the Domestic Eelations Court Act of the City of New York (L. 1933, ch. 482, as amd.).
In that proceeding the sole contested issue is the “ fair and reasonable sum according to his means ” (N. Y. City Dom. Rel. Ct. Act, § 101, subd. 1) which the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Loomis v. LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- McCarthy v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- People v. SchenkelNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Solomon v. SolomonNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- " Johnston " v. " Johnston "New York Family Court · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Langerman v. LangermanNew York Family Court · 1952
- Bates v. BatesNew York City Family Court · 1970
- Helman v. HelmanNew York Family Court · 1947
- Loeb v. LoebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Filicaza v. FilicazaNew York Family Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.