People v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
The People ask us to reverse the court of appeals’ ruling that defendant-respondent Robert C. Johnson (Johnson) was entitled to a sentence reduction under his plea agreement. The court of appeals ordered the reduction after concluding that the District Attorney (DA) breached the agreement by refusing to perform a polygraph examination on Johnson. Because we hold that the DA acted in good faith under the circumstances by refusing to proceed with the polygraph examination, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. 1
I
Defendant-Respondent Robert C. Johnson pled guilty in 1996 to two…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Amoco Oil Co. v. ErvinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- United States v. BunnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. AlegriaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Patton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- People v. ShreckColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. VenzorColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. Antonio-AntimoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Keller v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.