Legal Opinion

People v. Antonio-Antimo

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 18, 2000No. 99SC384PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

This court granted certiorari to address whether a plea must be vacated when a plea agreement results in an illegal sentence being imposed on a defendant. 1 We hold that when a legal plea bargain is enforced by means of an illegal sentence, the proper remedy, if possible, is to modify the illegal sentence but permit the valid and enforceable plea agreement to stand.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Respondent, Jorge Antonio-Antimo, was charged with unlawful sale of a schedule II controlled substance and possession of a schedule II controlled substance. See § 18-18-405(2)(a)(I), 6 C.R.S. (1999).…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. BunnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. ZakrzewskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Forbert v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Delgado v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. People v. BassfordColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. CorsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  4. People v. CorsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  5. People v. StarkweatherColorado Court of Appeals · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API