Legal Opinion

Keller Research Corp. v. Roquerre

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 11, 1951No. 11391PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks by its complaint to secure an injunction and recover damages on various causes of action which need not be outlined here. The defendant has filed an answer and also a cross-claim which is in three causes of action. The first two causes of action in the cross-claim are based upon statements in a letter sent or circulated by the plaintiff. The plaintiff has moved to compel the defendant to post a bond in accordance with the terms of the Statutes of California of 1871-72, page 533, as amended by the Statutes of 1880, page 81 and which is now generally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. McNeil v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Bushnell v. McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. United Electrical Radio and MacHine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  2. Ware v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hamar v. Hyatt Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1983
  4. Brown v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  5. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API