Legal Opinion

Malibu Auto Parts, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided October 7, 1977No. Record 761524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarrico, J.

For selling a quart of motor oil on a Sunday, Malibu Auto Parts, Incorporated, was convicted by the trial court of violating Code § 18.2-341, a part of Virginia’s Sunday Closing Law. Malibu’s appeal presents questions of the applicability and the constitutionality of the Closing Law.

The record shows that Malibu is a retailer of automotive parts and supplies, with a store in the City of Virginia Beach. On Sunday, July 4, 1976, a city police officer, Howard T. Carr, attired in civilian clothing, entered Malibu’s store and ordered a quart of motor oil. He told a clerk he wanted the oil for use…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market of Massachusetts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Manley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
  4. Mandell v. HaddonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  5. Bonnie BeLo Enterprises, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Caldor's, Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Benderson Development Co. v. SciortinoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Opty's Amoco, Inc. v. Village of South HollandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Audra L. Poole v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2025
  5. Benderson Development Co. v. SciortinoVirginia Beach County Circuit Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API