Opty's Amoco, Inc. v. Village of South Holland
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE CERDA
delivered the opinion of the court:
This consolidated appeal concerns the constitutionality of the Village of South Holland’s ordinance prohibiting certain business activities on Sundays. The ordinance challenged consists of sections 9 — 3(a), 9 — 3(b), 9 — 3(c), 9 — 3(d), and 9 — 3(e) of chapter 9 of article I of the Code of the Village of South Holland (South Holland, Ill., Code, art. I, ch. 9, §§9— 3(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) (19-)).
I. No. 1-89-2691
Plaintiffs, Opyt’s Amoco, Inc. (Opyt’s); 1-80 Investments Co., d/b/a Truck-o-mat (Truckomat); Linge, Ltd., d/b/a Calumet…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Braunfeld v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Material Service Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Opyt's Amoco, Inc. v. Village of South HollandIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Alden Nursing Center-Lakeland, Inc. v. PatlaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Alden Nursing Center-Lakeland, Inc. v. PatlaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Opyt's Amoco, Inc. v. Village of South HollandIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Opyt's Amoco, Inc. v. Village of South HollandIllinois Supreme Court · 1992