Legal Opinion

Opty's Amoco, Inc. v. Village of South Holland

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 30, 1991No. 1-89-2691,1-89-2908, 1-89-3049 consPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE CERDA

delivered the opinion of the court:

This consolidated appeal concerns the constitutionality of the Village of South Holland’s ordinance prohibiting certain business activities on Sundays. The ordinance challenged consists of sections 9 — 3(a), 9 — 3(b), 9 — 3(c), 9 — 3(d), and 9 — 3(e) of chapter 9 of article I of the Code of the Village of South Holland (South Holland, Ill., Code, art. I, ch. 9, §§9— 3(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) (19-)).

I. No. 1-89-2691

Plaintiffs, Opyt’s Amoco, Inc. (Opyt’s); 1-80 Investments Co., d/b/a Truck-o-mat (Truckomat); Linge, Ltd., d/b/a Calumet…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Braunfeld v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Material Service Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1961

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Opyt's Amoco, Inc. v. Village of South HollandIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Alden Nursing Center-Lakeland, Inc. v. PatlaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. Alden Nursing Center-Lakeland, Inc. v. PatlaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Opyt's Amoco, Inc. v. Village of South HollandIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Opyt's Amoco, Inc. v. Village of South HollandIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API