Legal Opinion

Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 25, 2008No. 2007-1546, 2007-1580PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROST, Circuit Judge.

This case involves alleged infringement by Gateway, Inc. (“Gateway”), Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”), and Dell Inc. (“Dell”) of two patents owned by Lucent Technologies, Inc. (“Lucent”). After a jury verdict of infringement and a damages award of $1,538,056,702, the district court granted judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”), and alternatively a new trial, on infringement and damages. Lucent Techs., Inc. v. Gateway, Inc., 509 F.Supp.2d 912 (S.D.Cal.2007) (“Lucent”). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the court’s grant of JMOL based on lack of standing for one…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. Lawrence B. Lockwood v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Moleculon Research Corporation v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  5. The Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Alcon Research, Ltd. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  3. Broadcom Corporation v. Emulex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  4. Rembrandt Data Technologies, LP v. AOL, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  5. Bell Bci Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API