Howard v. Adkins
Indiana Supreme Court
From Montgomery Circuit Court; Jere West, Judge. Action by Daniel V. Howard against Guy Adkins. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.
This action was brought by appellant to recover liquidated damages for the breach of a contract. A demurrer for want of facts was sustained to each paragraph of the complaint, and a judgment followed that appellant take nothing by his suit, and pay the costs.
1. The assignment of errors calls in question the action of the court in sustaining said demurrer. It is objected by counsel for appellee that appellant has not complied with rule twenty-two of this court in the preparation of his brief in this: “That it is confused and indefinite, with its several parts so intermingled with irrelevant…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Williams v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Hurley v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Ransdel v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Mead v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Wills v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Hogston v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Ditton v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Ames v. AmesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
- Doney v. LaughlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Geisendorff v. CobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.