Legal Opinion

Williams v. Brice

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1902No. Appeal, No. 351PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal, No. 351, Jan. T., 1901, by-defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 5, Phila. Co., March T., 1901, No. 354, for plaintiff on case stated in suit of Mary C. Williams v. Philip H. Brice. Case stated to determine the title to real estate. From the record it appeared that Mary C. Williams contracted to sell to Philip H. Brice for the consideration of $175,000, an undivided two-fifths interest in certain real estate in Allegheny county, Pennsylvania.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 351, Jan. T., 1901, by-defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 5, Phila. Co., March T., 1901, No. 354, for plaintiff on case stated in suit of Mary C. Williams v. Philip H. Brice. Case stated to determine the title to real estate. From the record it appeared that Mary C. Williams contracted to sell to Philip H. Brice for the consideration of $175,000, an undivided two-fifths interest in certain real estate in Allegheny county, Pennsylvania. The defendant claimed that as to one thirtieth of the real estate plaintiff had no title. Further facts appear by the opinion of Martin, P. J.,…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judgment in this case was entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $175,000 and is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Martin.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fairclaw v. ForrestCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Lusk's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Rzedzianowski's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Williams v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API