Ehrhardt v. Electrical & Instrumentation Unlimited
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COBB, District Judge.
This is an employment dispute case, wherein defendant employer has brought a Motion for Summary Judgment. Upon review, this court is of the opinion that defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be GRANTED.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SYNOPSIS
Defendant Electrical & Instrumentation Unlimited of Louisiana (“EIU”) employed James Ehrhardt (“Ehrhardt”) in January of 2000 as a general foreman for the defendant’s project at the Goodyear plant in Beaumont, Texas. During the hiring process, Ehrhardt completed and signed an employment application. The…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Frakes v. Crete Carrier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Gonzalez v. Harlingen Consolidated Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2015