Legal Opinion

Pacific Finance Corp. v. Bank of Yolo

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1932No. Docket No. Sac. 4619PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This cause arises out of two so-called “flooring” transactions between plaintiff finance corporation and one J. T. Hendley, an automobile dealer at Woodland. Defendant was drawn into the transactions by cashing two drafts and crediting to the account of Hendley the proceeds thereof. Both drafts were drawn by plaintiff’s Sacramento office upon its Los Angeles office, the first on February 2, 1928, for $4,610, the second on March 5, 1928, for $2,323.51; both were made payable to defendant bank and both contained in the body thereof the following recital: “In payment Sight Draft Automobiles…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sims v. . U.S. Trust Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Bowles Co. v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Pacific Finance Corp. v. HendleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Bank of Venice v. ClappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Bjorgo v. First National Bank of EmmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Modesto Building & Loan Ass'n v. WyldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Federal Insurance Company I.C. And Aetna Insurance Company v. Banco De PonceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  5. Universal Credit Co. v. M. C. Gale, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API