Legal Opinion
Rennie v. GLASS, MOLDERS, POTTERY, PLASTICS & ALLIED WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 22, 1999No. 3:97-cv-02238PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
In a four count complaint, plaintiff Kim Rennie seeks to hold defendant Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics and Allied Workers International Union (“International”) hable for sexual harassment in violation the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (“CFEPA”), retaliation in violation of CFEPA and the duty of fair representation pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress.
The defendant has moved for summary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barton v. City of BristolDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Brauer v. MXD Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Miro v. BridgeportDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023