Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Bowers

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 17, 1998No. Record 971257PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kinser

This appeal involves the amount of reasonable medical expenses incurred by an insured under a medical payments provision of an automobile insurance policy. Because we find that the term “incurred” includes only those amounts that the insured would be legally obligated to pay, we will reverse the judgment of the circuit court.

I

On April 17, 1995, Carroll Keith Bowers was involved in a motor vehicle accident in which he sustained injuries requiring medical treatment. At the time of the accident, Bowers was insured under an automobile insurance policy issued by State Farm Mutual Automobile…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. WebbSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HodgesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  3. Irby v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Lefebvre v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  5. Sanner v. Government Employees Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Acuar v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  2. Hardi v. MezzanotteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Mitchell v. HayesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1999
  4. US Airways, Inc. v. Commonwealth Ins.Arlington County Circuit Court · 2004
  5. Lindholm v. HassanDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API