Legal Opinion

Wooten v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Ins. Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2006No. 2005-CA-00303-SCT, 2003-CA-02457-SCTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

924 So.2d 519 (2006)

Bethany WOOTEN, a Minor, by and Through her Parents, Next Friends, and Guardians, Betty Wooten and Charles Wooten

v.

MISSISSIPPI FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY.

Nos. 2005-CA-00303-SCT, 2003-CA-02457-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 2, 2006.

Austin R. Nimocks, Biloxi, attorney for appellant.

Patrick H. Zachary, Hattiesburg, attorney for appellee.

EN BANC.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

GRAVES, Justice, for the Court.

¶ 1. The motion for rehearing is denied. The original opinion is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted therefor.

¶ 2. On March 31, 2002, Bethany Wooten ("Wooten") was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Courtesy Motors, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Noxubee Co. Sch. Dist. v. United Nat. Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Mississippi Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. BrittMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Szumigala v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HodgesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leonard v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Agustin Mendez Lopez v. Bellamare Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API