Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of St. Paul v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1930No. 27,794Published

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

Proceedings in mandamus brought by plaintiff (city) to compel defendant (company), a Minnesota corporation, to lay, construct and operate a double track line of street railway with the incidents necessary thereto for the operation thereof on Atlantic and Margaret streets in the city of St. Paul from the present terminus of the car line on Fourth and Atlantic streets, thence northerly on .Atlantic street to Margaret street, and thence east on Margaret street to Ruth avenue, and to compel it to run and operate cars thereon, all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Duluth v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API