Legal Opinion

Mevorah v. Bowles

Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1945No. 227PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, judge.

The Fitwell Garment Company, hereafter referred to as complainant, is a partnership composed of Isidore C. Mevorah, Dora Mevorah, Haim J. Mevorah, and Hyman S. Mevorah. It manufactures women’s outerwear garments, and carries on its business in New York City. Since the adoption of price control measures, it has been subject to Revised Maximum Price Regulation No. 287, and amendments thereto.

Under the Regulation, different kinds of garments, such as dresses and blouses, are considered under different “categories”; and no manufacturer may sell garments of any category at a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Interwoven Stocking Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White Trimming House, Inc. v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Parkleigh Fashions, Inc. v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API