Legal Opinion

Parkleigh Fashions, Inc. v. Porter

Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1946No. 309Published

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, judge.

This case is concerned with Revised Maximum Price Regulation 287,1 and arises out of the denial by the Administrator of a petition for a retroactive order permitting complainant to add a selling price line to its Spring Pricing Chart.

*600Complainant, a manufacturer of women’s apparel, filed an application in February 1945, under Section 14(b) of the above named regulation, asking for permission to include a group of suits priced at $22.75 in the .selling price lines as shown by its Spring Pricing Chart. Pricing charts, selling price lines, and the price line provisions under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas Paper Stock Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Mevorah v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API