Legal Opinion

Harner v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided June 23, 1999No. 06-98-00125-CRPublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice GRANT.

David Harner was indicted for the offense of attempted aggravated kidnapping. He was found guilty by a jury, which assessed punishment at confinement for ten years. The trial court sentenced him accordingly, and Harner appeals from this conviction.

Harner contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress and thereafter admitting his statement into evidence; in failing to instruct the jury that it could disregard his statement if it determined that his statement was involuntary; and in failing to include in the jury charge the lesser included…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. Teixeira v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  2. Burruss v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  3. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Josey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  5. Sessums v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API