Legal Opinion

Maestro Music, Inc. v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Company

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1960No. 6595PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Justice.

Maestro Music, Inc. (hereinafter called “Maestro”) and J. F. Cacioppo, Jr. (hereinafter called “Cacioppo”) (hereinafter collectively called “appellants”) appeal from a judgment entered against them by the Superior Court of Pima County in favor of The Rudolph Wurlitzer Company (hereinafter called “Wurlitzer”) in the sum of $36,638.68, together with attorney’s fees and interest.

*226Pursuant to written agreements, Maestro, during the years 1952 and 1953, acted as distributor of coin-operated phonographs and accessory merchandise manufactured by Wurlitzer. The territory covered by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. O. S. Stapley Co. v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Adler v. . Weis Fisher Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Collister v. Inter-State Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Davison v. RodesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Commercial Credit Co. v. Phoenix Hudson-Essex, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Desert Gold Mining Company, Marlin K. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Colvin v. Superior Equipment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. McGill v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Arizona State Board of Medical Examiners v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. General Electric Credit Corp. of Tennessee v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API