Dunn v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBaird, Judge
While I concur with the result reached by the majority in the remaining points of error, I respectfully dissent to the disposition reached in interrelated points of error one, two, three, four and five1. For the *527following reasons, I would abate this appeal.
As I understand the majority opinion, Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475, 484, 98 S.Ct. 1173, 1178, 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978), stands for the following proposition: when the possibility of a conflict of interest is brought to the attention of the trial court by either a pretrial motion or a trial objection, the trial court has the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988