Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 27, 1988No. 01-84-00029-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

WARREN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for kidnapping. Trial was before the court, which assessed punishment at six years confinement. This Court affirmed the conviction in Reynolds v. State, 679 S.W.2d *352715 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1984). On appellant’s first petition for discretionary review, the Court of Criminal Appeals held that the indictment did not provide appellant with requisite notice as to the method of restraint and remanded the case to this Court for a determination of whether the appellant was harmed by the trial court’s overruling of his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Juan Luis Zarate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API