Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Michigan Mutual Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 22, 1989No. 1-88-1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE QUINLAN *

delivered the opinion of the court:

Continental Casualty Company (Continental) filed suit in Cook County, Illinois, against Michigan Mutual Insurance Company (Michigan Mutual) for alleged bad faith in the negotiation and settlement of a claim in Michigan for its insured, U.S. Truck. Continental was U.S. Truck’s excess insurance carrier and Michigan Mutual was U.S. Truck’s primary insurance carrier. Michigan Mutual moved to dismiss the claim under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, based on the fact that Michigan, not Cook County, Illinois, was the more convenient forum. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Wieser v. Missouri Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Moore v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Ramada Inns, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. People Ex Rel. Madigan v. LeavellAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API