Legal Opinion

Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 22, 2025No. 3:20-cv-00321Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Aparna VASHISHT-ROTA, Case No.: 20-cv-0321-AGS-KSC 4 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 5 v. DECLARE PLAINTIFF A 6 HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT (ECF 330) et al., 7 Defendants. 8 9 Defendants seek sanctions against plaintiff Dr. Aparna Vashisht-Rota for 10 “swamp[ing] the courts with lawsuits, meritless filings, and a flood of improper 11 correspondence to endlessly relitigate losing arguments and torment Defendants.” 12 (ECF 330-1, at 7.) They request both $300,000 in monetary sanctions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. De Long v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Vashisht-Rota v. Howell ManagementCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API