Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Aparna VASHISHT-ROTA, Case No.: 20-cv-0321-AGS-KSC 4 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 5 v. DECLARE PLAINTIFF A 6 HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT (ECF 330) et al., 7 Defendants. 8 9 Defendants seek sanctions against plaintiff Dr. Aparna Vashisht-Rota for 10 “swamp[ing] the courts with lawsuits, meritless filings, and a flood of improper 11 correspondence to endlessly relitigate losing arguments and torment Defendants.” 12 (ECF 330-1, at 7.) They request both $300,000 in monetary sanctions…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- De Long v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Vashisht-Rota v. Howell ManagementCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021