Legal Opinion
Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided December 2, 2021No. 20210395-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2021 UT App 133
THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, Appellant, v. HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND CHRIS HOWELL, Appellees. Per Curiam Opinion No. 20210395-CA Filed December 2, 2021 First District Court, Logan Department The Honorable Angela Fonnesbeck No. 200100119 Aparna Vashisht-Rota, Appellant Pro Se Jeffrey Weston Shields, Elizabeth Butler, and Brennan J. Curtis, Attorneys for Appellees Before JUDGES GREGORY K. ORME, JILL M. POHLMAN, and DIANA HAGEN. PER CURIAM: ¶1 Aparna Vashisht-Rota appeals the district court’s April 26, 2021 memorandum decision and order determining that she…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Lundahl v. HalabiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Griffith v. GriffithUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Barton v. Utah Transit AuthorityUtah Supreme Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Black Oak Capital BOCA, LLC v. Paul Evans, LLC; Evan Fript; and Does 105; Evan Fript v. Black Oak Capital BOCA, LLC; Gregory D. Seare; Kurt Hanson; and BOCM3-Paul Evans-Senior Debt, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025
- Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Vashisht-Rota v. Utah Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023