Legal Opinion

Shier v. Freedman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1970No. 214PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting plaintiff’s motion for the inspection of the medical books or journals, pursuant to sec. 269.57 (1), Stats.

Sec. 269.57 (1), Stats., provides:

“(1) The court, or a judge thereof, may, upon due notice and cause shown, order either party to give to the other, within a specified time, an inspection of property or inspection and copy or permission to take a copy of any books and documents in his possession or under his control containing evidence relating to the action or special proceeding and may require…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northern Wisconsin Co-operative Tobacco Pool v. OlesonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. Northwestern Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Wisconsin Fertilizer Asso. v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Grefco, Inc. v. Franklin Roofing Supply, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shier v. FreedmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Whanger v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Shibilski v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Marshfield, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Colby v. ColbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Fanshaw v. Medical Protective Asso.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API