Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Fertilizer Asso. v. Karns

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1969No. 262PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

In Tilsen v. Rubin 2 this court reviewed a trial court’s order denying inspection under sec. 269.57 (1), Stats. The court stated:

“The language of the statute identifies the order which plaintiff seeks to obtain as one discretionary with the trial court. Accordingly, we should not reverse unless convinced that the court’s action constituted a clear abuse of discretion. The statute is a remedial one and must be construed liberally. . . . The burden of establishing such abuse of discretion is on the appellant.” (Emphasis added.) 3

Thus, the sole issue before this court is whether the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northern Wisconsin Co-operative Tobacco Pool v. OlesonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Townsend v. La Crosse Trailer Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. Northwestern Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Tilsen v. RubinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Cespuglio v. CespuglioWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Fertilizer Asso. v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Shier v. FreedmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Grefco, Inc. v. Franklin Roofing Supply, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Wisconsin Fertilizer Asso. v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API