Legal Opinion

Carlton v. Sley System Garages

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1940No. Appeal, 167PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Argued October 8, 1940. The plaintiff, an owner of an automobile, brought this action in trespass against defendant, a bailee for hire, to recover compensation for damages done to his car which had been entrusted to defendant. The case was submitted to a jury which found a verdict in plaintiff's favor for $250.95, the precise amount which he paid for the repair of the car. After judgment defendant appealed, assigning as error the refusal of its motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial.

The motion for judgment is based on the claim that the defendant was free from negligence "as a matter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schell v. Miller North Broad Storage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Taggart v. De FillippoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Schmitt v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Wolf v. Altoona & Logan Valley Electric Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Wessel v. Montgomery, Scott & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holt v. PariserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Redfoot v. J. T. Jenkins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Jackson v. Fort Pitt Hotel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Atkins v. Racquet Garage Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Widawski v. Lupowitz, TrusteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API