Legal Opinion

Public Employee Claims Division v. Chitwood

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 25, 1996No. 95-456PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREE LAYTON Roaf, Justice.

The issue in this appeal is whether the appellant Public Employee Claims Division of the Arkansas Insurance Department (PECD), the workers’ compensation carrier for state agencies, owes a one-third attorney fee as costs of collection from its subrogation claim against a personal injury judgment awarded to appellee Richard Chitwood, a state employee. We agree that the Circuit Court erred in finding that Chitwood’s attorneys were entided to recover one-third of PECD’s subrogation claim as costs of collection, and reverse.

Richard Chitwood, an employee of the Arkansas…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winfrey & Carlile v. NicklesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  2. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. State of Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement v. HarnageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Burt v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kimble v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Small v. CottrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Phillip Morris USA v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API