Legal Opinion

Arkansas Department of Human Services v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 5, 1993No. 92-917PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This appeal is from five instances in which a Chancery Court, Juvenile Division, held the Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS) liable for court costs, probation fees, and restitution to victims as a delinquent juvenile’s custodian pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330(5) & (6) (Supp. 1991). The cases have been consolidated on appeal because all involve that issue. DHS argues it is not a “custodian” of juveniles in its care as that term is used in the Statute and, even if it is a custodian, sovereign immunity protects it against assessment of the costs and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fireman's Insurance v. Arkansas State Claims CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Cammack v. ChalmersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Beaulieu v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Gatlin v. GatlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Page v. McKinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS v. MATTHEW ANDREWSSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  2. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. R.P.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. STATE DEPT. OF FIN. AND ADMIN. v. StatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Arkansas Public Defender Commission v. BurnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API