Douglass v. Rowland
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
NEARN, Judge.
On appeal, the controversy is between Douglass et ux. and Rowland et ux. who will hereafter be referred to in the singular.
Plaintiff Douglass and defendant Rowland are adjoining landowners. Douglass filed suit against Rowland seeking an injunction to halt the diversion of surface water from defendant’s land to that of the plaintiff and for the removal of alleged encroachments upon plaintiff’s land.
The Chancellor heard the case without intervention of a jury and enjoined the defendant from diverting surface waters upon plaintiff’s land and held that plaintiff was estopped to claim…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Branch v. WarrenTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Karash v. PigottTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Callahan v. Town of MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
- Denny v. Wilson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Duke v. HopperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. ShimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Gardiner v. WordTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Campbell County Board of Education v. Brownlee-Kesterson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- Sander v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.