Branch v. Warren
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
This suit had its origin in a contract for the construction of a residence for the plaintiffs. The trial judge held that plaintiffs’ cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations as incorporated in § 28-305 T.C.A., refused to permit plaintiffs to amend their declaration and dismissed their suit.
I
Plaintiffs instituted their suit in the Circuit Court at Alamo against Harris W. Warren, Harris E. Warren, and the Wickes Corporation. They allege that on or about April 28, 1968, they entered into a contract with the Warrens, for a stipulated sum, to construct a…
2Cited by57 opinions
- Merriman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
- Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. ShimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Craven v. LawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Hardcastle v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Karash v. PigottTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.