Legal Opinion
State v. Marshall
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 2013No. 2012-KA-0650PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.
| Daniel Marshall appeals his manslaughter conviction for the killing of Ronald Hodges, Jr.
Between him and his appellate counsel he assigns five errors. Because we conclude that the error they assigned about the trial judge’s denial of his motion for mistrial based upon the prosecutor’s cross-examination of him about his post-custody silence requires reversal of his conviction, we do not address the remaining assignments in the body of our opinion.1 At the trial, the prosecutor, over defense objection, cross-examined Mr. Marshall about invoking his right to remain silent…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HanktonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State of Louisiana v. Daniel MarshallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- State v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. HanktonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014