State of Louisiana v. Daniel Marshall
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtVictory, J.
|! Following defendant’s second degree murder trial and his conviction and sentence for the lesser verdict of manslaughter, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal vacated defendant’s conviction and sentence upon finding that the prosecutor’s use of defendant’s post-arrest silence, in violation of Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976), was not harmless because it undercut his plausible self-defense claim. We granted the State’s writ application, and, after reviewing the record and the applicable law, reverse the judgment of the court of appeal and reinstate defendant’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. MarshallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LenseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. MansfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017