Legal Opinion

Bates v. Connelly

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1995No. 93-SC-958-DGPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Chief Justice.

The issue in this case involves CR 76.20(2)(a), which sets out the guidelines for filing a motion for discretionary review of a circuit court judgment by the Court of Appeals and how it relates to the filing of a CR 59 motion, which pertains to filing a motion to alter, amend or vacate a judgment. The appellant argues that a judgment should not be considered final in determining the beginning of the 30 day period of time allowed for filing a motion for discretionary review under CR 76.20 when there is a motion before the lower court moving that the judgment be vacated,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murty Bros. Sales, Inc. v. PrestonKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Mason v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gullion v. GullionKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kurtsinger v. Board of Trustees of Kentucky Retirement SystemsKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Parker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Kurtsinger v. Board of Trustees of Kentucky Retirement SystemsKentucky Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API