Legal Opinion

Murty Bros. Sales, Inc. v. Preston

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBSON, Justice.

This case arises from a Joint Venture Agreement. The purpose of the Venture according to the Agreement was to “acquire, own, train, maintain, race, breed and otherwise deal with and dispose of” thoroughbred horses. One party, Preston Farms, primarily supplied the - necessary capital contributions and the second party, Murty Brothers, primarily managed the Venture and the assets thereof.

The continued existence of the Venture was scheduled to terminate June 30, 1985. However, the Agreement also provided under the section designated “Dissolution and *240Liquidation” that if either…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Elam v. Acme Well Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
  2. Maysville & Lexington Railroad v. PunnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1854
  3. Alexander v. Springfield Production Credit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BaileyKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bates v. ConnellyKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State Farm Insurance Co. v. EdwardsKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  4. AIK Selective Self Insurance Fund v. MayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. BaileyKentucky Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API