Legal Opinion

Gullion v. Gullion

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2005No. 2004-SC-000494-DGPublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Chief Justice.

This Court granted discretionary review upon motion of Appellant, Stephanie Gul-lion, to decide whether there is a basis in case law or the Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure to require affidavits to accompany a CR 59.05 motion to alter, amend or vacate a custody judgment. Affidavits are clearly required for KRS 403.340 motions when a party seeks to modify a custody order. However, in this case, modification of the custody order pursuant to KRS 403.340 was not possible until the trial court had ruled on the CR 59.05 motion, and thereby rendered a final judgment.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barry C. Cosgrove, Cross-Appellee v. Joseph Bartolotta and Mary-Bart, Llc, Doing Business as Bartolotta's Lake Park BistroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Nordin Construction Company v. City of NomeAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Fhc Equities, L.L.C. v. Mbl Life Assurance Corporation, a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Corex Corporation, D/B/A Quick Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Roslyn Currier v. First Resolution Inv. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Bowling v. Kentucky Department of CorrectionsKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Emberton v. GMRI, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Ford v. FordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2019
  5. Rumpel v. RumpelKentucky Supreme Court · 2014

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API