Archer v. City of Shreveport
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER-, Justice. .
Appellees have moved to • dismiss this appeal. However, the motion, grounded on the assertion that the controversy is now moot, lacks merit and cannot be sustained. *869Through the adoption on May 26, 1953 of a zoning ordinance (No. 49), purportedly amending Ordinance No. 80 of 1948, the Council of the City of Shreveport sought to change the classification, from “A-l Family Residence” to “D-Neighborhood Commercial District”, of property owned by Chris Demopulos and Alexander Mijalis and described as:
“Lots One (1), Two (2), Three (3), Four (4), Five (5), Six (6), Seven (7),…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of New Orleans v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
3Cited by8 opinions
- Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- City of Natchitoches v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Archer v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Krauss Co. v. DevelleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Garrett v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.